MICA Procedure vs Open Chevron Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Currently, more than 150 surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of hallux valgus. The abundance of techniques indicates that there is no technique that has been designated as a gold standard. In recent years, a particular interest in the use of minimally invasive techniques has grown. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare clinical, radiologic, and postoperative outcomes between the MICA technique and open chevron technique over a 1-year follow-up period. Methods: Between January 2016 and August 2020, data were prospectively collected from consecutive patients preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months following minimally invasive chevron and Akin (MICA) or open chevron osteotomies. Radiographic outcomes were measured using weightbearing radiographs preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), VAS (visual analog scale), Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Euro-QoL-5D (EQ5D) questionnaires. Results: Of the 68 patients, 42 patients (62%) underwent a MICA surgery and 26 patients (38%) underwent open chevron osteotomy. Both groups showed significant improvement in HVA, IMA, and DMAA at the 1-year follow-up. Our findings show that both clinical and radiologic outcomes of the MICA technique are comparable to the conventional open technique. No significant differences were found in clinical outcomes (VAS, AOFAS, MOXFQ, FFI, and FAOS), complication rate, and operative times. Conclusion: These results show that MICA is a safe alternative for chevron osteotomy. The clinical and radiologic outcomes of these 2 techniques by 12 months are comparable. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Anatomy of the Superficial Radial Nerve and Its Target Nerves for Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: An Anatomical Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical procedure for treating symptomatic neuroma, in which the neuroma is removed and the proximal nerve stump is coapted to a donor motor branch innervating a nearby muscle. This study aimed to identify optimal motor targets for TMR of the superficial radial nerve (SRN). METHODS: Seven cadaveric upper limbs were dissected to describe the course of the SRN in the forearm and motor nerve supply-number, length, diameter, and entry points in muscle of motor branches-for potential recipient muscles. RESULTS: The radial nerve provided three (three of six) motor branches, two (two of six) motor branches, or one (one of six) motor branch to the brachioradialis muscle, entering the muscle 21.7 ± 17.9 to 10.8 ± 15 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle. One (one of seven), two (three of seven), three (two of seven), or four (one of seven) motor branches innervated the extensor carpi radialis longus muscle, with entry points 13.9 ± 16.2 to 26.3 ± 14.9 mm distal from the lateral epicondyle. In all specimens, the posterior interosseous nerve gave off one motor branch to the extensor carpi radialis brevis, which divided into two or three secondary branches. The distal anterior interosseus nerve was assessed as a potential recipient for TMR coaptation and had a freely transferable length of 56.4 ± 12.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: When considering TMR for neuromas of the SRN in the distal third of the forearm and hand, the distal anterior interosseus nerve is a suitable donor target. For neuromas of the SRN in the proximal two-thirds of the forearm, the motor branches to the extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis, and brachioradialis are potential donor targets.

Reoperation Following Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.

BACKGROUND: The goal of zone II flexor tendon surgery is to perform a repair with sufficient strength to withstand the forces encountered during rehabilitation. Postoperative rerupture and adhesion formation may lead to reoperation. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with reoperation after primary zone II flexor tendon repair. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, a total of 252 fingers in 201 patients underwent zone II flexor tendon repair. A medical record review was performed to collect data regarding patient demographics, injury and treatment characteristics and postoperative complications including reoperation. Reoperation was defined as any unplanned surgical procedure performed after initial flexor tendon repair. RESULTS: There were 49 fingers (19%) in 42 patients that underwent reoperation at a median of 5.5 (interquartile range: 2.8-7.9) months. Older age, workers' compensation, and a Kessler-type repair of the flexor digitorum profundus were independently associated with reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro studies suggest that Kessler-type repairs are inferior compared with other suture configurations. Our study demonstrates a clinical correlation to these biomechanical studies. Our results suggest that Kessler-type repairs are inferior compared with non-Kessler-type repairs, due to postoperative complications requiring secondary surgeries.

Zone II Flexor Pollicis Longus Repair: Thumb Flexion and Complications.

Background: The aim of flexor pollicis longus (FPL) repair is to create a construct that is strong enough to withstand forces encountered during rehabilitation and to achieve an optimal active range of motion. The aim of this study was to: (1) assess factors influencing active thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint flexion; and (2) assess the factors associated with reoperation. Methods: Retrospectively, 104 patients with primary repair of a Zone II FPL laceration from 2000 to 2016 were identified. A medical chart review was performed to collect patient-, injury-, and surgery characteristics as well as the degree of postoperative active IP-flexion and occurrence of reoperation. Bivariate analyses were performed to identify factors influencing active IP-flexion and factors associated with reoperation. Results: The reoperation rate was 17% (n = 18) at a median of 3.4 months (range: 2.3-4.4). Indications for reoperation mainly included adhesion formation (n = 10, 56%) and re-rupture (n = 5, 28%). The median range of active IP-flexion was 30° (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-45) at a median of 12.4 weeks (IQR: 8.1-16.7). Solitary injury to the thumb (ß = 17.9, P = .022) and the use of epitendinous suture (ß = 10.0, P = .031) were associated with increased active IP-joint flexion. No factors were statistically associated with reoperation. Conclusions: About 1 in 5 patients undergo reoperation following primary repair of a Zone II FPL laceration, mostly within 6 months of initial surgery. The use of epitendinous suture is associated with greater active IP-flexion. Patients with multiple digits injured accompanying a Zone II FPL laceration have inferior IP-joint motion.